Written By: Anika Manav
If you study numerous annual reports, you might notice that many companies report a different Net Profit or Profit After Tax (PAT), in comparison to their Cash Flow from Operations (CFO). There are a few reasons for this difference, and one of them is that they represent slightly different aspects of the company.
Whereas the PAT of the company represents the total earnings that the company had, net of the costs for the year, the CFO depicts the position of the company in terms of only the operating activities.
Generally speaking, when a company calculates its profit (PAT), it deducts certain costs that don’t actually involve cash going out, like the gradual wear and tear of machines (called depreciation) or the spreading out of costs over time (called amortization). However, when calculating CFO, these non-cash costs are added back, which usually makes CFO larger than PAT.
If the case is the opposite, meaning that the PAT is higher than the CFO, this might indicate that some of the cash may be stuck in unpaid bills from customers, unsold inventory, or other business expenses. So, working Capital or the income from sources other than the main operations of the business is unusually high in this case.
This situation can be a warning sign, as it means the company’s profit on paper looks good, but it may not have enough cash available to run its day-to-day operations smoothly.
Let us discuss these and more reasons for this difference through the following example:
Godfrey Philips India Limited (GPIL) showed a Net Profit or PAT of ₹833.9 crore in its Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended March 31st, 2024. On the other hand, the company reported the CFO to be ₹290.2 crore on its Cash Flow Statement.
Comments
Log in to comment and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.